How corrupt are the UK media editors, writers and executives?

AADHIKAR in association with ‘KHOODEELAAR! the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 Area No to CrossRail hole Bill’ campaign
The 5th Edition published from London at 1728 Hrs GMT /UK time on Sunday 10 December

2006

About AADHIKAR Media Foundation, LEGAL DISCLAIMER in brief on accessing these contents and what the word AADHIKAR means Updated on Thursday 16 November 2006

Legal and evidential disclaimer
London Wednesday 29 November 2006Reporting and commentary exclusively commissioned, written, edited and published by AADHIKARonline coming straight from the centre of the East End of London engaged in the battle to defend the community against multifarious attacks by Big Business, their touts in control of the 'local democratic' council [!], an inept band of opposition on the council and assortments of other 'holders of public post' in the name of the local area corresponding to the ‘London Borough of Tower Hamlets’
AADHIKARonline published by the AADHIKAR MEDIA FOUNDATION in association with Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill
Publishing programme on Sunday 10 December 2006
Why Crossrail hole backer Tower Hamlets Council has got it wrong AGAIN about its stupid, typically ignorant, ‘proposal’ to CrossRail [the CLRL company and to all the assorted other promoters of the Crass Rail scam] about the ‘need’ or ‘no need’ for a CrossRail hole in the East End of London – a full report here on what the ignorant Crossrail-hole-backing ‘officers’ placed in positions within Tower Hamlets Council at considerable expense to the public, basically have no understanding of ordinary arithmetic, let alone of complex issues of deeper moment and implication
Just HOW corrupt are the editors, executives, writers and correspondents of the British media?
Review of the British press’ Sunday 10 December 2006 -Why Khoodeelaar! Accurately predicted that Crossrail hole-backer Michael Keith would be ousted from his seat.- And why the Blair-poodle, war-mongering, racist ignorant ‘Observer’ morons are wring again about Tower Hamlets and why they are over-plugging, over promoting all the crooks and parasitizes that have no credibility in the community - Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign had told Michael Keith, then ‘leader’ of the Crossrail hole-inviting Tower Hamlets Council, on Thursday 22 September 2005, that unless he apologised to the community for promoting the CrossRail hole plot and unless he moved to withdraw all collusion by the Council clique he was ‘leading’ with CRASSrail then he would be OUSTED at the then forthcoming local council election. That was 22 September 2005. Within hours, Khoodeelaar! Started the campaign to get Michael Keith identified for his role in bringing the CRASSrail problem on to the East End. He was diagnosed, his every crucial action and misconduct scrutinised and drawn to the attention of all concerned.The exact comprehensive details of the Khoodeelaar! Analytical, investigative and campaigning work has been published in summary throughout on the internet and in print. But the fact remains that Michael Keith would not have been ousted because some discredited and corrupt racist ‘alternative to the discredited and corrupt racist clique ‘led’ by Michael Keith was ‘aspiring to take his sweat’. – More on this shortly
Why the corrupt, smarmy TELCO man, appearing smarmily on the corrupt BBC 1 slot fronted by the corrupt Blairng Andrew Marr-the-truth was a disgraceful abuse of the concept of the community in the ‘East End of London’ – More later
Khoodeelaar! Is backed by local residents, businesses and community in latest Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole phase of campaign to force Tower Hamlets Council to pass motion saying No to CrossRail hole
Khoodeelaar! Demand to Tower Hamlets Council, as passed by the largest ever public meeting on specific issue held in the Hanbury Street on 22 January 2006 is being backed by local community demanding that Tower Hamlets Council at its ‘full council’ meeting due on 13 December 2006 passes that unequivocal motion saying No to Crossrail hole in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 Area
Khoodeelaar! Street meeting held at Hanbury Street/ Brick Lane on Saturday 9 December 2006 – many new supporters pledge opposition to Crossrail attack on the East End
Khoodeelaar! Exposes what actually took pace – or didn’t – at the Crossrail hole plotters meeting held at the building [78 Quaker Street London E1] of the Spitalfields Housing Association on 5 December 2006 – is George Galloway too far out being on tour in South Africa when he should be addressing the question of the serious contradictions within the ranks of what used to be his ‘Respect’ grouping? Why would one former RESPECT candidate at the local Council elections [4 May 2006] spill the beans on another RESPECT council candidate at the same election over CrossRail and what stance, if any, the 'Respect' ‘party’ now takes on the Crassrail attack plan on the East End of London? In any case, why has George Galloway allowed the web site that is now operated in his name, to publish in the first week of December 2006 [after the Khoodeelaar! comments on RESPECT confusion etc over the Crossrail hole colluders charade 5 December 2006] an alleged piece from the alleged publication called 'Tower Hamlets Recorder' about where George Galloway stands on CrossRail, apparently published in July 2006? This is 10 December 2006 and five days after the two former RESPECT council candidates did attend a CrossRail colluding propaganda disaster charade at 78 Quaker Street, off Brick Lane, London E1. One of them went in without telling us that they were going in there. That one, Carole Swords, had been contacted by Khoodeelaar! Prior to the demonstration and told of the demonstration. In fact, she had been contacted for Khoodeelaar! by local RESPECT councillor Fozol Miah on the 'phone. Khoodeelaar! had contacted Fozol Miah as a local councillor to come and join the demonstration against Crossrail hole Bill charade. Fozol Miah gave his apologies for not being able to take part himself in the demonstration against Crossrail on that occasion but, on being informed of the existence of Carole Swords as a face of the RESPECT group in relation to various events that took place in Tower Hamlets, undertook to get in touch with Carole Swords. Which he must have done within less than a minute.. Because within minutes, Carole Swords contacted Khoodeelaar! by phone.. She arrived at the venue, appearing to be part of the demonstration. But then, within literally seconds, she went into the building. She said nothing to the Khoodeelaar! Demonstrators outside as to what she was going in there for. The Khoodeelaar! demonstration members assumed that she was going in there to use the toilet. It wasn’t until after almost before the demo ended that she appeared back. It was only then that she said that she was attending on behalf of ‘another organisation’. She was asked about the RESPECT position in CrossRail and she was not happy being asked that question. [More on this aspect in the later editions of AADHIKARonline ] The Khoodeelaar! campaign against Crossrail demonstrated against that charade. The Khoodeelaar! campaign had asked one of the ex-candidates for RESPECT, Badrul Islam, not to go in. He was told, in clear terms, that the RESPECT organisation had been opposed to CrossRail. He was also asked: ‘don’t you agree with that policy any more He did not want to comment on what his position was on CrossRail and Respect. He said that he was going in to take part in the charade for CrossRail [not his words, these are Khoodeelaar! Words] as a member of another group or organisation. What is going on 'within' or 'between' the several RESPECT groups in Tower HamletsHow can a former RESPECT council candidate split his 'politics' like that? [To be continued]
AADHIKARonline published by the AADHIKAR MEDIA FOUNDATION in association with Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill
Publishing programme on Saturday 9 December 2006
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole in the Hanbury Street – local campaign events during Saturday 9 December 2006 in Hanbury Street, Princelet Street, Brick Lane and nearby streets – The Khoodeelaar! campaign demand today which is being supported by local businesses and residents is this Khoodeelaar! To CrossRail hole Bill campaign Supported by the signatories to this demand updated and issued in December 2006 ‘We the local residents and business people and visitors to the Brick lane and Whitechapel London E1 area support the Khoodeelaar! campaign against CrossRail hole Bill demand being put to Tower Hamlets Council for implementation at the scheduled full Council meeting on 13 December 2006. We are saying that we fully support the Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill demand that was made on the Tower Hamlets Council by the meeting held in support of the Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole on Sunday 22 January 2006 at the Brady Centre in the Hanbury Street London E1. We reiterate that the community does not need the CrossRail, hole either in the Hanbury Street or in the Woodseer Street and that the Council is wrong to pretend that either is acceptable to the local community or to the businesses. We are particularly concerned that at a time when the present UK Government and the local CrossRail hole-backing Tower Hamlets council are making noises about the need to respect and preserve the environment that they are quite callous about the community’s concern against the CrossRail hole and the environmental devastation it will cause to the area. We are also mindful of the serious threat to the health of children that the hole will cause. Additionally we believe that the CrossRail hole will seriously undermine the interests of the hundreds of thousands of people who visit the area every year. We reaffirm our backing for the Khoodeelaar! legal action programme and also pledge our support to Khoodeelaar! campaign actions to the point where there is no longer any threat of a Crossrail hole attack being mounted on this community. We are also backing Khoodeelaar! in their representation of the No to Crossrail hole to the UK Parliament, to the UK Government and to the CLRL and to the London mayor Ken Livingstone.’ Programme of activities – pointing out the various physical damage that will be caused by Crossrail to the area; showing what the local Council has done to neglect the local community over Crossrail, asking people to join the defence of the local community, the local environment against Crossrail hole attacks and other similar violations- More in later editions during the day today, Saturday 9 December 2006
The AADHIKAR Ethical Statement written and published for the first time in this version at 1310 Hrs GMT Wednesday 6 December 2006
All the files are originally researched authored and published by AADHIKARonline. This news and commentary service is provided for free with the object of helping the cause of telling the truth and of the cause of learning how to defy the liars who masquerade under guises of being occupants of public office and in control of powers in the name of the people. These series of reports and commentaries has been specifically designed to expose the manifold lies and the corrupt practise which in fact underlie the Tower Hamlets Council, the Mayor of London and the Blair regime. We are doing so in order to zero in on whatever remains by way of evidential factual and honest arguments in alleged justification for a Crossrail hole Bill. In doing so, we are shedding light on all relevant aspects of the operation of the local corrupt Council. Likewise we are unearthing facts and bringing to light facets of the abuses of public funds and of public powers that is taking place both on the Tower Hamlets Council as well as on the Greater London Assembly. And within and via the Crossrail company and inside the UK Houses of Parliament. The veracity of everything we publish here is tested by repeated applications of the criteria we have devised to check the authenticity and the veracity of any factual component of what we publish. Throughout the process prior to publishing each item, we conduct those tests to make sure that no aspect of our factual reporting is open to any serious evidential challenge. We endeavour to get our facts right and always strive to make comments, however apparently strident and hard-hitting, as fair and ethical as possible and desirable. We are committed to telling the truth about the liars who have been backing the Crossrail hole attacks on our community. Until they stop lying, we shall not stop telling the truth about their many and varied lies…We say No to Crossrail hole. We say No to Crossrail as a whole.. And we say No to all similar projects, schemes plots and scam aimed at the community which have the same features of lies, fraud and deception as does the Crossrail hole Bill project scheme plot scam…

How corrupt are the UK media edirors, writers and executives?

AADHIKAR in association with ‘KHOODEELAAR! the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 Area No to CrossRail hole Bill’ campaign
The 5th Edition published from London at 1728 Hrs GMT /UK time on Sunday 10 December

2006

About AADHIKAR Media Foundation, LEGAL DISCLAIMER in brief on accessing these contents and what the word AADHIKAR means Updated on Thursday 16 November 2006

Legal and evidential disclaimer
London Wednesday 29 November 2006Reporting and commentary exclusively commissioned, written, edited and published by AADHIKARonline coming straight from the centre of the East End of London engaged in the battle to defend the community against multifarious attacks by Big Business, their touts in control of the 'local democratic' council [!], an inept band of opposition on the council and assortments of other 'holders of public post' in the name of the local area corresponding to the ‘London Borough of Tower Hamlets’
AADHIKARonline published by the AADHIKAR MEDIA FOUNDATION in association with Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill
Publishing programme on Sunday 10 December 2006
Why Crossrail hole backer Tower Hamlets Council has got it wrong AGAIN about its stupid, typically ignorant, ‘proposal’ to CrossRail [the CLRL company and to all the assorted other promoters of the Crass Rail scam] about the ‘need’ or ‘no need’ for a CrossRail hole in the East End of London – a full report here on what the ignorant Crossrail-hole-backing ‘officers’ placed in positions within Tower Hamlets Council at considerable expense to the public, basically have no understanding of ordinary arithmetic, let alone of complex issues of deeper moment and implication
Just HOW corrupt are the editors, executives, writers and correspondents of the British media?
Review of the British press’ Sunday 10 December 2006 -Why Khoodeelaar! Accurately predicted that Crossrail hole-backer Michael Keith would be ousted from his seat.- And why the Blair-poodle, war-mongering, racist ignorant ‘Observer’ morons are wring again about Tower Hamlets and why they are over-plugging, over promoting all the crooks and parasitizes that have no credibility in the community - Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill campaign had told Michael Keith, then ‘leader’ of the Crossrail hole-inviting Tower Hamlets Council, on Thursday 22 September 2005, that unless he apologised to the community for promoting the CrossRail hole plot and unless he moved to withdraw all collusion by the Council clique he was ‘leading’ with CRASSrail then he would be OUSTED at the then forthcoming local council election. That was 22 September 2005. Within hours, Khoodeelaar! Started the campaign to get Michael Keith identified for his role in bringing the CRASSrail problem on to the East End. He was diagnosed, his every crucial action and misconduct scrutinised and drawn to the attention of all concerned.The exact comprehensive details of the Khoodeelaar! Analytical, investigative and campaigning work has been published in summary throughout on the internet and in print. But the fact remains that Michael Keith would not have been ousted because some discredited and corrupt racist ‘alternative to the discredited and corrupt racist clique ‘led’ by Michael Keith was ‘aspiring to take his sweat’. – More on this shortly
Why the corrupt, smarmy TELCO man, appearing smarmily on the corrupt BBC 1 slot fronted by the corrupt Blairng Andrew Marr-the-truth was a disgraceful abuse of the concept of the community in the ‘East End of London’ – More later
Khoodeelaar! Is backed by local residents, businesses and community in latest Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole phase of campaign to force Tower Hamlets Council to pass motion saying No to CrossRail hole
Khoodeelaar! Demand to Tower Hamlets Council, as passed by the largest ever public meeting on specific issue held in the Hanbury Street on 22 January 2006 is being backed by local community demanding that Tower Hamlets Council at its ‘full council’ meeting due on 13 December 2006 passes that unequivocal motion saying No to Crossrail hole in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 Area
Khoodeelaar! Street meeting held at Hanbury Street/ Brick Lane on Saturday 9 December 2006 – many new supporters pledge opposition to Crossrail attack on the East End
Khoodeelaar! Exposes what actually took pace – or didn’t – at the Crossrail hole plotters meeting held at the building [78 Quaker Street London E1] of the Spitalfields Housing Association on 5 December 2006 – is George Galloway too far out being on tour in South Africa when he should be addressing the question of the serious contradictions within the ranks of what used to be his ‘Respect’ grouping? Why would one former RESPECT candidate at the local Council elections [4 May 2006] spill the beans on another RESPECT council candidate at the same election over CrossRail and what stance, if any, the 'Respect' ‘party’ now takes on the Crassrail attack plan on the East End of London? In any case, why has George Galloway allowed the web site that is now operated in his name, to publish in the first week of December 2006 [after the Khoodeelaar! comments on RESPECT confusion etc over the Crossrail hole colluders charade 5 December 2006] an alleged piece from the alleged publication called 'Tower Hamlets Recorder' about where George Galloway stands on CrossRail, apparently published in July 2006? This is 10 December 2006 and five days after the two former RESPECT council candidates did attend a CrossRail colluding propaganda disaster charade at 78 Quaker Street, off Brick Lane, London E1. One of them went in without telling us that they were going in there. That one, Carole Swords, had been contacted by Khoodeelaar! Prior to the demonstration and told of the demonstration. In fact, she had been contacted for Khoodeelaar! by local RESPECT councillor Fozol Miah on the 'phone. Khoodeelaar! had contacted Fozol Miah as a local councillor to come and join the demonstration against Crossrail hole Bill charade. Fozol Miah gave his apologies for not being able to take part himself in the demonstration against Crossrail on that occasion but, on being informed of the existence of Carole Swords as a face of the RESPECT group in relation to various events that took place in Tower Hamlets, undertook to get in touch with Carole Swords. Which he must have done within less than a minute.. Because within minutes, Carole Swords contacted Khoodeelaar! by phone.. She arrived at the venue, appearing to be part of the demonstration. But then, within literally seconds, she went into the building. She said nothing to the Khoodeelaar! Demonstrators outside as to what she was going in there for. The Khoodeelaar! demonstration members assumed that she was going in there to use the toilet. It wasn’t until after almost before the demo ended that she appeared back. It was only then that she said that she was attending on behalf of ‘another organisation’. She was asked about the RESPECT position in CrossRail and she was not happy being asked that question. [More on this aspect in the later editions of AADHIKARonline ] The Khoodeelaar! campaign against Crossrail demonstrated against that charade. The Khoodeelaar! campaign had asked one of the ex-candidates for RESPECT, Badrul Islam, not to go in. He was told, in clear terms, that the RESPECT organisation had been opposed to CrossRail. He was also asked: ‘don’t you agree with that policy any more He did not want to comment on what his position was on CrossRail and Respect. He said that he was going in to take part in the charade for CrossRail [not his words, these are Khoodeelaar! Words] as a member of another group or organisation. What is going on 'within' or 'between' the several RESPECT groups in Tower HamletsHow can a former RESPECT council candidate split his 'politics' like that? [To be continued]
AADHIKARonline published by the AADHIKAR MEDIA FOUNDATION in association with Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill
Publishing programme on Saturday 9 December 2006
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole in the Hanbury Street – local campaign events during Saturday 9 December 2006 in Hanbury Street, Princelet Street, Brick Lane and nearby streets – The Khoodeelaar! campaign demand today which is being supported by local businesses and residents is this Khoodeelaar! To CrossRail hole Bill campaign Supported by the signatories to this demand updated and issued in December 2006 ‘We the local residents and business people and visitors to the Brick lane and Whitechapel London E1 area support the Khoodeelaar! campaign against CrossRail hole Bill demand being put to Tower Hamlets Council for implementation at the scheduled full Council meeting on 13 December 2006. We are saying that we fully support the Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole Bill demand that was made on the Tower Hamlets Council by the meeting held in support of the Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole on Sunday 22 January 2006 at the Brady Centre in the Hanbury Street London E1. We reiterate that the community does not need the CrossRail, hole either in the Hanbury Street or in the Woodseer Street and that the Council is wrong to pretend that either is acceptable to the local community or to the businesses. We are particularly concerned that at a time when the present UK Government and the local CrossRail hole-backing Tower Hamlets council are making noises about the need to respect and preserve the environment that they are quite callous about the community’s concern against the CrossRail hole and the environmental devastation it will cause to the area. We are also mindful of the serious threat to the health of children that the hole will cause. Additionally we believe that the CrossRail hole will seriously undermine the interests of the hundreds of thousands of people who visit the area every year. We reaffirm our backing for the Khoodeelaar! legal action programme and also pledge our support to Khoodeelaar! campaign actions to the point where there is no longer any threat of a Crossrail hole attack being mounted on this community. We are also backing Khoodeelaar! in their representation of the No to Crossrail hole to the UK Parliament, to the UK Government and to the CLRL and to the London mayor Ken Livingstone.’ Programme of activities – pointing out the various physical damage that will be caused by Crossrail to the area; showing what the local Council has done to neglect the local community over Crossrail, asking people to join the defence of the local community, the local environment against Crossrail hole attacks and other similar violations- More in later editions during the day today, Saturday 9 December 2006
The AADHIKAR Ethical Statement written and published for the first time in this version at 1310 Hrs GMT Wednesday 6 December 2006
All the files are originally researched authored and published by AADHIKARonline. This news and commentary service is provided for free with the object of helping the cause of telling the truth and of the cause of learning how to defy the liars who masquerade under guises of being occupants of public office and in control of powers in the name of the people. These series of reports and commentaries has been specifically designed to expose the manifold lies and the corrupt practise which in fact underlie the Tower Hamlets Council, the Mayor of London and the Blair regime. We are doing so in order to zero in on whatever remains by way of evidential factual and honest arguments in alleged justification for a Crossrail hole Bill. In doing so, we are shedding light on all relevant aspects of the operation of the local corrupt Council. Likewise we are unearthing facts and bringing to light facets of the abuses of public funds and of public powers that is taking place both on the Tower Hamlets Council as well as on the Greater London Assembly. And within and via the Crossrail company and inside the UK Houses of Parliament. The veracity of everything we publish here is tested by repeated applications of the criteria we have devised to check the authenticity and the veracity of any factual component of what we publish. Throughout the process prior to publishing each item, we conduct those tests to make sure that no aspect of our factual reporting is open to any serious evidential challenge. We endeavour to get our facts right and always strive to make comments, however apparently strident and hard-hitting, as fair and ethical as possible and desirable. We are committed to telling the truth about the liars who have been backing the Crossrail hole attacks on our community. Until they stop lying, we shall not stop telling the truth about their many and varied lies…We say No to Crossrail hole. We say No to Crossrail as a whole.. And we say No to all similar projects, schemes plots and scam aimed at the community which have the same features of lies, fraud and deception as does the Crossrail hole Bill project scheme plot scam…